I have recently had my single worst coffee experience. Actually, my worst ever coffee related experience was probably also one of my first memories: one morning, I was crawling around on the floor beneath our old Rayburn whilst my mother was making the ritual mid-morning brew. A few coffee beans had fallen on the floor, and I, presumably attracted by the rich, alluring aroma, immediately sniffed one of the stray seeds …with a little too much gusto, as it was promptly sucked up my nose, where it securely lodged itself at a frightening depth in my nasal passage. Needless to say, a certain amount of panic, wailing, and tears ensued as my mother tried to dislodge the bean from it’s temporary home. After some time she managed to achieve this, and a visit to the hospital was avoided, but I was left with the lasting mental scars! Thinking about it, this little incident is probably the moment when the story of coffee became inextricably linked to my own. For many years after this, my relationship with coffee was fairly pedestrian, but eventually - and, I feel, inevitably – I came to work with coffee for a living, and although I now extract coffee from the bean, rather than the bean from me, I think the bond is well and truly cemented.
Anyway, my second worst coffee experience relates to these little gadgets above which are known as stove-top ‘espresso’ makers, moka-pots, or by their various brand names, and I’ve heard some pretty favorable reports about them in my time working with coffee. For example, I know that they are used by a huge percentage of Italians in their own homes to make their coffee, rather than opting for more high-tech home espresso machines – which would seem to be a fairly sound endorsement of their abilities. I’ve even heard some people say they actually prefer the type of espresso you get from these machines (one of whom is a fellow barista!?). Given their simplicity and convenience, and their rather disconcertingly good reputation, I was keen to try one, and so imagine my eager curiosity when my girlfriend brought one back (an ‘Andora’) from the kitchen shop where she works!
On the one hand, as a professional barista who devotes himself to (trying) to produce the most beautiful and true elixir possible from the coffee bean by means of the modern espresso technique, I was somewhat fearful of the moka-pot’s abilities after hearing it’s favorable press (if this simple little home contraption can produce espresso close to what I can, then I’m in trouble! I was thinking) – but on the other hand, I was quietly confident that whilst it would hopefully produce something very nice – and give me a means to produce something approaching espresso at home – it wouldn’t be able to come close to the real thing.
After all, the coffee these pots produce is certainly not true, modern espresso as we know it when properly produced by a skilled barista. These little pots work by using steam pressure alone, and therefore only operate at about 1.5 bars, instead of the 9 bars (approx) used to make true espresso. Also, the the grind they use is apparently a courser, filter grind, and I guess the temperature of the water that brews the coffee must be 100 degrees C or more, because the water is forced up through the internal tubes only when the water is boiling and producing steam – therefore potentially burning the coffee. There is no water filtration, no real way of controlling the extraction time for optimum results, etc, etc. All in all, their technical credentials as for as espresso goes are somewhat laughable – but, nonetheless, I am respectful of any technique that can produce some type of beautiful coffee, and I endeavoured to use it to the best of it’s potential.
I obtained some nice, medium roast, freshly ground Kenyan coffee. We then loaded the pot and followed some basic information that I’d read on the net: we didn’t tamp the coffee because apparently you’re not meant to, we then placed it on the (gas) hob on a low heat and stood watching it in eager anticipation; I had read that you should keep an eye on the pots so that when they begin to boil and produce the coffee you can switch off the heat to minimise the burning effect. This we did. Sure enough, after a while, the pot began bubbling and spluttering, and coffee emmerged from the top of the brewing spout. It was disappointingly thin and crema-less, but I was still hopeful that it would taste good – after all, espresso isn’t the only way to make nice coffee, of course (and I was secretly happy that there was no evidence of crema!). We tried turning off the heat straight away so as not to burn the coffee in the hope the residual pressure would complete the extraction – but the flow immediately stopped, so I turned the heat back on on the assumption the continued boiling was necessary to produce the pressure to brew. We brewed only maybe 3 or 4 fluid ounces from this ‘6 tazza’ pot, then shut off the heat.
Now for the tasting! We poured the coffee into some carefully pre-heated cups. At this, point I was already dubious – the fluid looked pretty lame, and the smell in the kitchen was somewhat questionable. Then I smelt the aroma in the cup (although stench would probably be a more fitting description) – it did not smell good at all – yes there was coffee-smell, but it also smelt very acrid and metallic. I sipped the drink, and whilst still hopeful, was by no means going to swallow it without first letting it sit in my mouth for a second or two… It barely lasted that long. I can only describe the concoction as Hell water. We both immediately spat out the hideous brew, half gagging on it’s noxious properties – burnt, and with an horrible chemical/metallic overtone.
Now, maybe our pot has a problem. If you can tell what that may be, then please let me know, because for all that I wouldn’t want it to be able to replicate true espresso, I’d like to think it could be better than this. But even if there is something faulty with our moka-pot that has caused it to go so horrifically wrong, from what I’ve seen, I don’t think it would make anything quite like the real thing anyway…


May 22, 2007 at 1:22 pm |
Stovetop is a great way to make a good cup of coffee when you don’t have a La Marzocco on hand. I equate it with a french press and in fact it is kind of a reverse french press…not as high tech or tastey as the clover, but still damn good. Right, so there are a lot of reasons why you pot may have tasted bad….I make it every morning that I am not at work and have had plenty of time to find out all the ways it can go terribly wrong. I have never followed directions. I learned how to use it from my dad who picked up ours in Italy 25 years ago. I read the directions that come with the newer ones (purchased at Target) and I dont really agree with their method. I fill up water to the half way point on the screw (not the line), fill the backet with pretty finely ground coffee (espress ground, so a 2 on those big grinders), and then I put the burner to high. When it starts garbling or whistling as it does sometimes (cheap machine) I turn off the burner and it continues to bubble until it fills the pot. There will be no creme, but it does produce a good strong cup. I also use espresso and not regular coffee. It may never be what you want it to be, but it produces a more consistant decent cup than any drip machine and a stronger cup than a french press. I think the problem is that a low setting the stove usually leads to the coffee grounds burning or cooking. I have made pots of ash before and its not pleasant. Dont give up on the french. I think you set the bar too high.
cheers
May 23, 2007 at 9:25 am |
I used stovetop’s on gas and on standard old hot plate, and the turning off as soon as you hear/see the coffee only works for the hot plate – with gas there is barely any residual heat after you switch it off and so you’ll just get the first part of the brew.
The metallic taste goes away (almost completely) if you used it a couple of times. The standard stovetop’s are made out of aluminium but there are also stainless steel ones. But there are quuite a lot of votes for and against both versions.
saluti
June 3, 2007 at 2:10 pm |
Cheers for the comments, folks! It’s nice to get some feed back.
First of all, don’t get me wrong – I’m not an expert coffee cupper – I’ll be the first to admit that I’m not that experienced at identifying and distiguishing all the subtle and complex tasting notes that can be present within coffees.
But I do know enough to know when certain things are good, or when they’re really bad – and it’s my job to set the bar pretty high – I wouldn’t be doing my job properly if I didn’t try to make the very best coffee, and if couldn’t tell when it was bad (even though a lot of other people in the trade don’t really care about what they’re doing, I take it seriously as a cuisine, and really do care!).
…And the coffee that came out of our moka-pot in this case was truly disgusting – by anybody’s standards, I’m sure; which leads me to believe there is perhaps something wrong with it (possibly with the metal inside the base chamber because it smells badly of metal/chemical). Honestly – it was so bad that I cannot even bring myself to try it out again yet.
But – whilst I don’t like to hear people refering to them as ‘espresso makers’ because they don’t make true espresso – I am disappointed that I cannot make the nice, strong, concentrated type of moka-pot coffee that many people rave about – so maybe I’ll buy another one on the assumption that this one is faulty.
Afterall, I don’t always need an expensive, pro espresso machine to make coffee that I really enjoy – at home, I usually use a simple, cafetiere/french press and find that (using good quality, fresh coffee) I can enjoy this just as much (albeit in a slightly different way) as the espresso or caffe latte that I would make at work. So I’m by no means opposed to more simple methods for making coffee, but our stove-top pot made something really terrible.
Trev
July 23, 2007 at 9:33 pm |
Still laughing over the childhood trauma experience with the bean. Good post. Espresso tastes bad on a brand new Synesso. Matter of fact, in my opinion all coffee tastes bad on anything new… break it in, keep messing around with the parameters. Even a Clover makes a bad cup… I’ve had many. The best tasting espresso is during the busiest rushes, is it not?
Robert
July 24, 2007 at 4:56 pm |
Yeah, I suppose the espresso does often seem (to look) better during the busiest periods – I never get chance to actually try it then though! I guess that’s down to finding a nice stable balance of cleanliness, seasoning and temperature.
I’d like to see/taste one of these Clovers in action, I’ve heard a lot about them and they sound like a pretty good system.
I’ll give the pot another go soon … when I dare!
December 10, 2007 at 5:02 am |
You’re supposed to throw the first pot out dude, its going to taste bad the first run through.
Try it again.
December 10, 2007 at 7:33 pm |
Hi!
Well, actually it’s a second-hand pot that has been used before – so it wasn’t its first use.
Because I don’t really know its history, I can’t be sure whether it might actually be damaged or not. The inside of the water container certainly has an unpleasant metal/chemical smell to it that doesn’t instinctively make me want to brew coffee in it.
I really will give it another try sometime though, but I’m too busy with the Europiccola and Rocky at the moment!
November 28, 2008 at 4:38 pm |
Your Problems:
1. You used regular coffee instead of espresso grounds. Don’t.
2. This is the first time you used it. Make a bunch of batches with cheap regular coffee and throw away the results before even tasting one.
3. I really hope you didn’t put it in the dishwasher.
4. Was it Bialetti brand? The only other one that’s even worth trying is called a “Moka Junior,” but it’s not preferable. Always use a Bialetti.
5. Don’t turn it off and then turn it on again. That ruins the batch.
6. Low heat makes it burn. Use medium-high heat.
7. Is it secondhand? It could definitely have been put in the dishwasher by the previous owner. That makes it taste terrible, and the previous owner probably didn’t want it anymore.
8. I am not trying to be mean, but you’re being a coffee snob. It’s close enough to espresso to use in any espresso drinks, you just put a little extra in. Not much, but a little.
9. Did you fill the water all the way up to the plug? Did you fill the grounds holder all the way? Never try and make a half-pot of espresso/coffee with a Moka Pot.
Hope it was helpful for ya.
December 3, 2008 at 12:59 am |
Hi!
Thanks for the info – when I get chance I’ll be sure to try it out.
To all stove-top pot enthusiasts!
Wow! I wrote this post quite a while ago, and it’s the only post on the whole site that talks of stove-top pots. I’m constantly surprised that it’s this post that continues to receive the most comments! These pots certainly seem to have a well practised, dedicated and loyal fan-base, and I apologise for discounting this method too quickly in this post!
I don’t doubt that they are capable of making some kind of nice coffee; this was merely my first attempt at using one, where I followed some perhaps misleading information, with a second-hand pot, that resulted in a particularly bad experience. Every machine or brewing method takes a while to get used to though (and even years to master!), so I concede I need to devote more time to experiments with this type, and I have since acquired what appears to be a really promising new stainless steel model which I will practice with at some point.
Sorry if the post comes across as coffee-snobbish! I spend most of my time as a barista deliberately trying NOT to be too preachy about coffee so as not to put people off – instead diligently striving to produce and gently promote the very best coffee I am able to …whilst at the same time often being disappointed and disheartened by the fact that most people don’t get how amazing coffee can be. More frequently, in fact, I’d say I find the snobbery directed towards me – by people looking down on the job of the barista. I think there’s a fine line between ’snobbery’, and simply delighting as a craftsman/professional in the finer points of a cuisine – and wanting others to realise its potential too. I suppose on this site I don’t feel the need to hold back so much when it comes to thoughts about coffee, and so sometimes I might get a bit carried away and judge things too quickly!
Most of my own coffee-making experience is with espresso, cafetiere, single cup filter, and cupping – all of which methods I know to be capable of producing SUBLIME coffee, and this is a level of appreciation that I don’t apologise for! Nevertheless I’m always interested in exploring other ways of brewing that allow great coffee to shine, and who knows (I don’t yet – I haven’t played with this method enough), but maybe stove-top pots are capable of equal greatness, or at least a nice level of good-ness! I guess the reasons I came across as a bit of an espressonazi in this post were because:
A) People often call this type of brewing ‘espresso’, and I still don’t think I can agree with this term, for all that it may well be a great/good method in it’s own right, and
B) Because, in relation to the the potential accuracy and wonders of the espresso method, I have doubts about the potential of stove-top pots by comparison, due to issues surrounding the water temperature, etc. Although I may be wrong – I know from other machines (especially the Europiccola) that high water temps can possibly be surfed down.
When I get chance I will certainly experiment with these pots more, and have not given-up on them, despite my initial experience!
Cheers
Trevor
December 22, 2008 at 10:34 pm |
If you’re getting another one, get a Bialetti. Seriously, don’t risk it. They are the only sure bet. The other ones are a little cheaper, but you pay a lot for that in quality.